top of page

Retroactively of Child Support Part Two

Writer: Shankar Law Office
Shankar Law Office
Mar 31, 2025
1 min read

Updated: Apr 17, 2025


Why is retroactive child support so important in terms of the law?


Retroactive child support simply holds payors to their existing (and unfulfilled) support obligations.


Michel v Craydon from the supreme Court of Canada offers us guidance importance of retroactive support and its impact on daily life.


Some important passages from the court are worth noting:


[23] Retroactive child support is a debt; by default, there is no reason why it should not be awarded unless there are strong reasons not to do so. See: Michel – par. 132.


[24] Retroactive awards are not exceptional. They can always be avoided by proper payment. See: D.B.S.- par. 97.


[25] The neglect or underpayment of support is strongly connected to child poverty and female poverty.


Analysis:


This part focusses on the responsibility of payors who are required to pay child support retroactively. What happens if the payor does not pay the money? How does it affect the children? What are the duties that a payor has towards their children?


The answers seem fairly obvious but clearly the reason that the court has enunciated these guidelines are because payors are not fulfilling their responsibility.


At Shankar Law, we will help you navigate through this extremely complex area of law.


We are happy to help clients virtually anywhere in Ontario!


We now have four offices conveniently located to serve you better in Owen Sound, Port Elgin, Wiarton, and Kincardine. Serving the Lake Huron and Georgian Bay Shorelines from Goderich to Collingwood and the surrounding areas. We are here to help with all of your Family Law, Criminal Law, Real Estate Law and Will matters.




 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Reasonable doubt in a sexual assault case

R. v. W, 2026 ONCJ 522 Overview In R. v. W, 2026 ONCJ 522, the Ontario Court of Justice considered allegations of sexual assault and sexual exploitation against a teacher arising from an incident at a

 
 
Funding in an unequal complex family case

KV v L et al., 2026 ONSC 5053 Overview In KV v. L et al., 2026 ONSC 5053, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered whether one party in complex family litigation should be required to provide

 
 
Cost consequences of intimate partner violence

M v. M, 2026 ONSC 4259 In M v. M, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered a lengthy marriage marked by allegations of physical violence, threats, psychological abuse, isolation, financial con

 
 
Criminal Lawyers Association
CONTACT US
Thanks for submitting!
Heading 6
Collaborative Law Certificate for Ram Shankar
  • Facebook - White Circle
  • LinkedIn - White Circle

226-256-8054

​​​​© 2026 by Shankar Law Office

Terms of Use: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult a lawyer for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as a lawyer-client relationship has been established.

AI-Assisted Content Disclaimer: Some information provided in our blogs and social media posts may include content generated or supplemented by artificial intelligence. It is intended solely for general informational purposes. It should not be construed as legal advice or relied upon as a substitute for consultation with a licensed solicitor. No solicitor–client relationship is formed by viewing or using this information. Always seek professional legal counsel for advice regarding your particular circumstances.
bottom of page